User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Linux Ventana; xx; Transformer TF101 Build/HTJ85B) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/8.0 Safari/534.13

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 8.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 8.0WebKit GNU/Linux AsusTransformer TF101tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 8.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 8.0closeLinux AsusTransformer TF101closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit Android 3.2AsusEee Pad Transformertabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 8.0closeLinux AsusTF101Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:44 | by ThaDafinser