User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; M-MP840M Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.107 Safari/537.36 OPR/29.0.1809.92117

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 29.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 29.0.1809.92117closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 29.0Blink Android 4.2MediacomSmartPad 8.0 Mobiletabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 29.0.1809.92117closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 29.0.1809closeAndroid 4.2.2MediacomM-MP840Mcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 29.0Blink 537.36Android 4.2.2MediacomSmartPad 8.0 Mobiletabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 29.0.1809.92117closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 29closeAndroid 4.2MediacomMP840MTabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:44 | by ThaDafinser