User agent detail

Opera/9.80(Linux armv6I; Opera TV Store/5530; Smart-BD; M; Linux/SmartBD; B-HM5160; Mediatek) Presto/2.12.362 Version/12.11 (3c:07:71:e7:5a:2c BDP-S1200_EUR M19.D.0046 M19.R.0035 M)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 12.11Presto 2.12Linux Smartphone OS Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 12.11Presto GNU/Linux tv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.11 (3c:07:71:e7:5a:2c BDP-S1200_EUR M19.D.0046 M19.R.0035 M)closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.11closeLinux closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.362 SonyBDP-S1200 Blu-ray Playertelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.11closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:46 | by ThaDafinser