User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 0.2WebKit Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 0.2.149.27closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 0.2WebKit Windows 2000desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 0.2.149.27closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 0.2.149closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome Beta 0.2.149.27Webkit 525.13Windows 2000desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 0.2.149.27closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeMac OS X 10.5.6Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:47 | by ThaDafinser