User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; zh-CN; MI 2A Build/JRO03L) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.7.5.418 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 9.7U3 Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 9.7WebKit Android 4.1XiaomiMI 2Asmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.7.5closeAndroid 4.1.1XiaoMiMI 2Acloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 9.7Webkit 533.1Android 4.1.1XiaomiMi 2Amobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.1XiaomiMI 2ASmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:48 | by ThaDafinser