User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; HM NOTE 1LTEGLOBAL Build/KTU84Q) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.109 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 40.0Blink Android 4.4XiaomiHM Note 1LTEGLOBALphabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 40.0.2214closeAndroid 4.4.4XiaoMiHM NOTE 1LTEGLOBALcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 40Blink 537.36Android 4.4.4XiaomiRedmi Note 1mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:51 | by ThaDafinser