User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0; NX505J Build/KVT49L) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2357.78 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 43.0Blink Android 5.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.78closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 43.0Blink Android 5.0ZTENubia Z7 maxsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.78closeAndroid 5.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 43.0.2357closeAndroid 5.0NX505Jcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 43Blink 537.36Android 4.4.2ZTENubia Z7 Maxmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.78closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 38closeAndroid 5.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:52 | by ThaDafinser