User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; U; en-us) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.22 like Chrome/34.0.1847.137 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Silk 3.22Blink Android AmazonKindleEbook Readeryesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.22closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 34.0Blink GNU/Linux AmazonKindle Firetabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.22closeLinux AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Silk 3.22Blink 537.36FireOS AmazonKindle Firetabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 1.1closeMac OS X 10.6.3AmazonD01400Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:52 | by ThaDafinser