User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1.1; G Watch R Build/LCA44B) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.157 Crosswalk/15.44.384.12 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 44.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.157closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 44.0Blink Android 5.1tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.157closeChrome OS 44.0.2403.157closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 44.0.2403closeAndroid 5.1.1G Watch Rcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Crosswalk WebView 15Blink 537.36Android Wear LGG Watch Rwatchyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.157closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 39closeAndroid 5.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:53 | by ThaDafinser