User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.133 Safari/537.6 Midori/0.4

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 18.0WebKit WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Midori 0.4WebKit Windows Vistadesktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Midori 0.4Webkit 537.6Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 18.0.1025.162closeOpenBSD amd64 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:53 | by ThaDafinser