User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; SAMSUNG SM-J110G Build/KTU84P) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) SamsungBrowser/2.0 Chrome/34.0.1847.76 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Samsung Browser 2.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 34.0Blink Android 4.4SamsungSM-J110Gsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.76closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 34.0.1847closeAndroid 4.4.4SamsungSM-J110Gcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Samsung Browser 2.0Blink 537.36Android 4.4.4SamsungGalaxy J1 Acemobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.76closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Samsung Browser 2.0closeAndroid 4.4SamsungSM-J110GSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:54 | by ThaDafinser