User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 6033X Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.1AlcatelOne Touch Idol UltraMobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 31.0Blink Android 4.1AlcatelOne Touch 6033Xsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.1.1AlcatelOne Touch 6033Xcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 31Blink 537.36Android 4.1.1AlcatelOne Touch Idol Ultramobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 31closeAndroid 4.1AlcatelOne Touch 6033XSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:55 | by ThaDafinser