User agent detail

dopodT8588/1.0 WindowsMobile/6.5 CEOS/5.2 release/5.0 Opera/9.7 WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP2.0 Configuration/CLDC1.1

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 1 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 9.7Presto Windows DopodT8588feature phoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.7close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.7closeWindows Mobile closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile 9.7 Windows Mobile 6.5DopodT8588mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:40:59 | by ThaDafinser