User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 2.3.5; zh-cn; iNote_beyond; 480*854) UCWEB7.9.0.94/139/444

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 7.9 GNU/Linux iTeliNote beyondsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0closeAndroid 2.3.5closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 7.9 Android 2.3.5iTeliNote beyondmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:00 | by ThaDafinser