User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv7l; HbbTV/1.2.1 (; Philips; 28HFL5009D12; ; PHILIPSTV; CE-HTML/1.0 NETTV/4.4.1 SmartTvA/3.0.0 Firmware/004.001.163.001 (PhilipsTV, 3.1.1,)en) ) Presto/2.12.407 Version/12.50

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12Linux Smartphone OS Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 12.50Presto GNU/Linux Philips28HFL5009D12tv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.2.1closeLinux Philips28HFL5009D12closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 PhilipsHFL5009 Net TVtelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:01 | by ThaDafinser