User agent detail

Vodafone/1.0/HTC_Diamond Opera/9.50 (Windows NT 5.1; U; de)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 9.50Presto 2.2 HTCDiamondMobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 9.50Presto Windows XPHTCDiamond Operasmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.50closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.50closeWindows XP HTCDiamond Operacloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile 9.50 Windows Mobile HTCTouch Diamondmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close HTCDiamondFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:02 | by ThaDafinser