User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; Windows Phone 8.1; Android 4.0; ARM; Trident/7.0; Touch; rv:11.0; IEMobile/11.0; Microsoft; Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM) like iPhone OS 7_0_3 Mac OS X AppleWebKit/537 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/533.1

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IEMobile 11.0Trident 7.0WinPhone8.1 8.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
IE Mobile 11.0Trident Windows Phone 8.1NokiaLumia 640 XLphabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeChrome OS closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 11.0closeWindows Phone 8.1MicrosoftLumia 640 XL Dual SIMcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Mobile Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Phone 8.1MicrosoftLumia 640mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 11.0closeWindows Phone 8.1Nokia640 XLSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:02 | by ThaDafinser