User agent detail

HTC_HD2_T8585 Opera/9.7 (Windows NT 5.1; U; xx)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 9.7Presto 2.2 HTCHD2 T8585Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 9.7Presto Windows XPHTCHD2 T8585smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.7closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.7closeWindows XP HTCHD2_T8585closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile 9.7 Windows Mobile HTCHD2mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close HTCT8585Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:03 | by ThaDafinser