User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/4B2086

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS 4.3AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.17.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 4.3AppleiPod Touchportable media playeryes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 4.3.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 4.3.0closeiOS 4.3.0AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 533.17.9iOS 4.3.0AppleiPod touchmediayescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 4.3.0closeiOS 4.3.0AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:05 | by ThaDafinser