User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1.1; H60-L01 Build/HDH60-L01) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/45.0.2427.6 Mobile Safari/537.36 360 Aphone Browser (6.9.9.66beta)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 45.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 45.0.2427.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
360 Phone Browser 6.9WebKit Android 5.1HuaweiHonor 6smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2427.6closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 45.0.2427closeAndroid 5.1.1H60-L01closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Qihoo 360 Browser 6.9.9.66Blink 537.36Android 5.1.1HuaweiHonor 6mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2427.6closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 39closeAndroid 5.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:07 | by ThaDafinser