User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; AUXUS Nuclea N1 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.64462

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.64462closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.2iBerryNuclea N1smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64462closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212closeAndroid 4.2.1AUXUS Nuclea N1closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink 537.36Android 4.2.1iBerryAuxus Nuclea N1mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64462closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 16closeAndroid 4.2iBerryAuxus Nuclea N1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:07 | by ThaDafinser