User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; id-; PD6D1J Build/KVT49L) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.24 T5/2.0 bdbrowser_i18n/4.4.0.2

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Baidu Browser 4.4T5 Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.4SmartfrenAndromax V3ssmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.4.2closeAndroid 4.4.2PD6D1Jcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Baidu Browser 4.4.0.2Webkit 534.24Android 4.4.2SmartfrenAndromax V3smobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.4closeAndroid 4.4SmartfrenPD6D1JSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:08 | by ThaDafinser