User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; R820 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/45.0.2454.94 Mobile Safari/537.36 360 Aphone Browser (6.9.9.67beta)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 45.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
360 Phone Browser 6.9WebKit Android 4.2OPPOR820smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 45.0.2454closeAndroid 4.2.2OppoR820closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Qihoo 360 Browser 6.9.9.67Blink 537.36Android 4.2.2R820mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:09 | by ThaDafinser