User agent detail

Karbonn A25 Linux/3.0.13 Android/4.0.4 Release/06.09.2013 Browser/AppleWebKit534.30 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mobile Safari/534.30 Android 4.0.1;

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0KarbonnA25 Linuxsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.1closeAndroid 4.0.4closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.4KarbonnA25mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.0closeAndroid 4.0KarbonnA25Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:10 | by ThaDafinser