User agent detail

LG-D722 Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0.2; LG-D722 Build/LRX22G.A1428918170) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/34.0.1847.118 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.118closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 34.0Blink Android 5.0LGD722smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.118closeAndroid 5.0.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 34.0.1847closeAndroid 5.0.2LGD722closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
LG Browser Blink 537.36Android 5.0.2LGG3 Smobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.118closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 34closeAndroid 5.0LGD722Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:10 | by ThaDafinser