User agent detail

TOPS/1.0 WoPhone/1.0 UPhone/1.0 Browser/UPhoneWebBrowser1.0 Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 Mozilla/5.0+(Linux;+U;+UPhone+TOPS+1.0UPhone+TOPS+1.0;+zh-cn;+Android+9.8)+AppleWebKit/532.9++UPhoneWebKit/532.9++(KHTML, like Gecko)+Mobile+Safari/532.9+

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 532.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android yes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeAndroid closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 532.9WoPhone 1.0mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit closeLinux Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:12 | by ThaDafinser