User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0.2; SM-G9209 Build/LRX22G; xx) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/43.0.2357.121 Mobile Safari/537.36; 360 Aphone Browser (6.9.9.14)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.121closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
360 Phone Browser 6.9WebKit Android 5.0SamsungSM-G9209smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.121closeAndroid 5.0.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 43.0.2357closeAndroid 5.0.2SamsungSM-G9209closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Qihoo 360 Browser 6.9.9.14Blink 537.36Android 5.0.2SamsungGalaxy S6mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.121closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 38closeAndroid 5.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:12 | by ThaDafinser