User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; U; WebPositive/533.4; Haiku) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.55 Safari/533.4

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 5.0.375.55closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
WebPositive WebKit Haiku OS desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 5.0.375.55close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 5.0.375close closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
WebPositive Webkit 533.4Haiku desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 5.0.375.55closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 5.0.375.55closecompatible Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:13 | by ThaDafinser