User agent detail

OneBrowser/4.2.0/Adr(Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; en-us; ADR6325 Build/GRJ22) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/533.1

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
OneBrowser 4.2WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
ONE Browser 4.2WebKit Android 2.3HTCADR6325smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.4closeAndroid 2.3.4ADR6325closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
OneBrowser 4.2.0Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.4HTCMergemobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3HTCADR6325Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:13 | by ThaDafinser