User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S5230-Bouygues/S5230AGIF2 SHP/VPP/R5 Jasmine/0.8 Nextreaming SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1

Detected by 6 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Jasmine 0.8NetFront JAVA SamsungGT-S5230Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S5230-Bouygues S5230AGIF2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Jasmine 0.8 SamsungGT-S5230smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Jasmine 0.8close SamsungGT-S5230-Bouyguescloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Dolfin 0.8 Touchwiz 1.0SamsungStarmobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungGT-S5230Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:14 | by ThaDafinser