User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.76 Safari/537.36 OPR/19.0.1326.47

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 19.0Blink MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 19.0.1326.47closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 19.0Blink Mac 10.7desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 19.0.1326.47closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 19.0.1326closeMac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 19.0Blink 537.36OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 19.0.1326.47closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:17 | by ThaDafinser