User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/6.0; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; HPNTDFJS)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IE 10.0Trident 6.0Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident Windows 8HPdesktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 7.0closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows 8desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 10(Compatibility View)closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:17 | by ThaDafinser