User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; ru-ru; PMP7170B3G_DUO Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, \xd0\xba\xd0\xb0\xd0\xba Gecko) Version/4.0 \xd0\x9c\xd0\xbe\xd0\xb1\xd0\xb8\xd0\xbb\xd1\x8c\xd0\xbd\xd1\x8b\xd0\xb9Safari/534.30

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1PrestigioPMP7170B3G DUOtabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.2PrestigioPMP7170B3G_DUOcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Android Browser Gecko 534.30Android 4.1.2PrestigioMultipad 7.0 Prime Duo 3Gtabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1PrestigioPMP7170B3GTabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:17 | by ThaDafinser