User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux mipsel; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; TOSHIBA; DTV_L4363; 7.1.90.30.01.1; a5; ) ; ToshibaTP/2.0.0 (+DRM) ; xx) AppleWebKit/537.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) TOSHIBA-DTV (DTV_L4363; 7.1.90.30.01.1; 2013A; EU)

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
GNU/Linux ToshibaIRHD-5100Stv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeTOSHIBA 2013TOSHIBADTV_L4363closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 537.4 ToshibaRegza L4363 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:18 | by ThaDafinser