User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; zh-CN; RC9731C Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.3.1.344 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 9.3U3 Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 9.3WebKit Android 4.13QRC9731Ctabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.1closeAndroid 4.1.13QRC9731Ccloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 9.3Webkit 534.31Android 4.1.13QQoo! Q-Pad RC9731Ctabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 10closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:18 | by ThaDafinser