User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; ELEMENT 7 V2 BASIC Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.65583

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.65583closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.0SencorElement 7 V2 Basictabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.65583closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212closeAndroid 4.0.4ELEMENT 7 V2 BASICcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 16.0Blink 537.36Android 4.0.4SencorElement 7 V2 Basictabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.65583closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:18 | by ThaDafinser