User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; RC0722C Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.40 Safari/537.31 OPR/14.0.1074.54070

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 14.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 14.0.1074.54070closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 14.0Presto Android 4.13QRC0722Ctabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 14.0.1074.54070closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 14.0.1074closeAndroid 4.1.13QRC0722Ccloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 14.0Webkit 537.31Android 4.1.13QQoo! Q-Pad RC0722Ctabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 14.0.1074.54070closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:19 | by ThaDafinser