User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-E250/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.101 (GUI) MMP/2.0 (compatible; Googlebot-Mobile/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 6 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
yesGoogle Bot MobileCrawler Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-E250 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
yesGooglebotSearch bot Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglebot-Mobileclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
closeyesGooglebot Mobileclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebot Mobileclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungSGH E250iFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:19 | by ThaDafinser