User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Linux ; xx) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Espial/6.0.4 en-US;L7200 Version/4.0 Safari/531.2+

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Espial TV Browser 6.0WebKit GNU/Linux tv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 531.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Espial 6.0.4Webkit 531.2 ToshibaRegza L7200 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:19 | by ThaDafinser