User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; Opera TV Store/5896; HbbTV/1.2.1 (PVR; freesat/1.0; hms1000sph2; 1.0.0; 1.0.0; UX-PRISM--OP-NONE); ce-html/1.0) Presto/2.12.407 Version/12.50 Model/Humax-TestingDevice

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 12.50Presto GNU/Linux HumaxHMS-1000Stv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.50 Model/Humax-TestingDevicecloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.2.1closeLinux freesat/1.0hms1000sph2closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 HumaxHMS-1000S Digital Receivertelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:20 | by ThaDafinser