User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Intel Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/538.1 debian/unstable (3.8.2-5) Epiphany/3.8.2

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Safari WebKit MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Epiphany 3.8WebKit Debian desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 3.8.2closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
GNOME Web 3.8.2Webkit 538.1OS X desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:21 | by ThaDafinser