User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; zh-cn; ETON T890 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17 T5/1.0 baiduboxapp/4.2 (Baidu; P1 4.2.2)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2EtonT890smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2ETON T890closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 4.2.2ETON T890mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:21 | by ThaDafinser