User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.3; id-; Smartfren Andromax AD688G Build/JLS36C) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) FlyFlow/3.1 Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.24 T5/2.0

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
FlyFlow 3.1T5 Android Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.3SmartfrenAndromax C2smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Baidu Explorer 3.1closeAndroid 4.3Smartfren Andromax AD688Gcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Baidu Browser 3.1Webkit 534.24Android 4.3SmartfrenAndromax C2mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.3closeAndroid 4.3SmartfrenAD688GSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:22 | by ThaDafinser