User agent detail

NokiaN90-1/3.0545.5.1 Series60/2.8 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 (en-US; rv:9.3.0) Clecko/20120116 Classilla/CFM

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Nokia Browser JAVA NokiaN90Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NokiaN90-1 3.0545.5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Nokia OSS Browser 2.8 Symbian OS Series 60 2.8NokiaN90smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 3.0545.5.1closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close NokiaN90-1closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Series60 2.8NokiaN90mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 2.8NokiaN90Feature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:23 | by ThaDafinser