User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 4.0.3; xx; HTC T328w; 480*800) UCWEB8.7.2.214/145/800

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 8.7WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 8.7 GNU/Linux HTCT328wsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.2closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCT328wcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 8.7 Android 4.0.3HTCDesire Vmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:24 | by ThaDafinser