User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 2.2.1; GT-I9000 Build/FROYO) AppleWebKit/537.27 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.77.34.5 Mobile Safari/537.27

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 19.0WebKit Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 19.77WebKit Android 2.2SamsungGALAXY Ssmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 19.77.34closeAndroid 2.2.1SamsungGT-I9000closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome Content Shell Webkit 537.27Android 2.2.1SamsungGalaxy Smobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 19closeAndroid 2.2SamsungGT-I9000Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:24 | by ThaDafinser