User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 (x86_64)) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/33.0.1750.152 Chrome/33.0.1750.152 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chromium 33.0Blink Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chromium 33.0Blink Ubuntu desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 33.0.1750closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chromium 33.0.1750.152Blink 537.36Ubuntu desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:24 | by ThaDafinser