User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; HM NOTE 1LTE Build/KVT49L) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.141 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.4XiaomiHM NOTE 1LTEMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 35.0Blink Android 4.4XiaomiHM Note 1LTEphabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.4.2XiaoMiHM NOTE 1LTEcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 35Blink 537.36Android 4.4.2XiaomiRedmi Note 1mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.4XiaomiHM NOTE 1LTESmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:25 | by ThaDafinser