User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1.1; KFMEWI Build/LMY47O) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/41.51020.2250.0238 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.51020.2250.0238closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 41.51020Blink Android 5.1tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.51020.2250.0238closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.51020.2250closeAndroid 5.1.1KFMEWIcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Amazon WebView Blink 537.36FireOS 5AmazonFire HD 8tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.51020.2250.0238closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 41closeAndroid 5.1AmazonKFMEWITabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:28 | by ThaDafinser