User agent detail

T-smart_G18_TD/1.0 Linux/2.6.35 Android/2.3.5 Release/7.16.2012 Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) FlyFlow/2.4 Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1 baidubrowser/061_6.5.4.2_diordna_084_023/trams-T_01_5.3.2_81G-trams-T/71

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Baidu Browser 061WebKit Android 2.3yes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Baidu Browser 61closeAndroid 2.3.5closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Baidu Browser 2.4Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5T-smartG18mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3T-SmartG18Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:41:28 | by ThaDafinser